Taborn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Taborn v. State

543 S.W.3d 84

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2018

DocketWD 80540

StatusPublished

This text of 543 S.W.3d 84 (Taborn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taborn v. State, 543 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Anthony L. Taborn appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion and argues that it was error to deny his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective when she failed to raise a claim of error on direct appeal involving the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence at trial. Because appellate counsel's strategic decision not to raise this issue on direct appeal was reasonable, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Anthony L. Taborn appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion and argues that it was error to deny his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective when she failed to raise a claim of error on direct appeal involving the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence at trial. Because appellate counsel's strategic decision not to raise this issue on direct appeal was reasonable, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 S.W.3d 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taborn-v-state-moctapp-2018.