Tabor v. Macon Railway & Light Co.

59 S.E. 225, 129 Ga. 417, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 393
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1907·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The charge of the court, when considered in its entirety, embraced the general principles of law applicable to the facts of the case; and the extracts upon which error was assigned were not erroneous for any reason set forth in the assignments of error. If any amplification of the general principles which the charge contained had been desired, they should have been made the subject of appropriate and timely written requests.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no sufficient reason appears for reversing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All Justices concur, except Holden, J., who did not preside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tabor v. Macon Railway & Light Co., 59 S.E. 225, 129 Ga. 417, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 393 (Ga. 1907).

59 S.E. 225 (Tabor v. Macon Railway & Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fievet v. Curl
100 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Cloud v. Stewart
88 S.E.2d 323 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Shanks v. State
57 S.E.2d 357 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Barton v. State
53 S.E.2d 707 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Fite v. McEntyre
49 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Rhodes v. State
47 S.E.2d 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Burke v. State
47 S.E.2d 116 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Swinson v. Jones
38 S.E.2d 878 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Brown v. Service Coach Lines Inc.
31 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)