Tabor v. Buxton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Tabor v. Buxton

840 So. 2d 130, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 611, 2002 WL 1587130

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 19, 2002·No. 2000191·Published

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

This court, on June 22, 2001, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 837 So.2d 335 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (table). The Supreme Court of Alabama has affirmed in part and reversed in part this court’s judgment and remanded the cause. Ex parte Tabor, 840 So.2d 115 (Ala.2002). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed insofar as it set aside its 1993 and 1995 orders and determined that Tabor owed an arrearage. The cause is remand[131] ed for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

This court, on June 22, 2001, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 837 So.2d 335 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (table). The Supreme Court of Alabama has affirmed in part and reversed in part this court’s judgment and remanded the cause. Ex parte Tabor, 840 So.2d 115 (Ala.2002). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed insofar as it set aside its 1993 and 1995 orders and determined that Tabor owed an arrearage. The cause is remand[131] ed for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Tabor v. Buxton, 840 So. 2d 130, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 611, 2002 WL 1587130 (Ala. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

840 So. 2d 130 (Tabor v. Buxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related