Tabor v. Buxton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Tabor v. Buxton

840 So. 2d 130, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 611, 2002 WL 1587130

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 19, 2002

Docket2000191

StatusPublished

This text of 840 So. 2d 130 (Tabor v. Buxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tabor v. Buxton, 840 So. 2d 130, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 611, 2002 WL 1587130 (Ala. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

This court, on June 22, 2001, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 837 So.2d 335 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (table). The Supreme Court of Alabama has affirmed in part and reversed in part this court’s judgment and remanded the cause. Ex parte Tabor, 840 So.2d 115 (Ala.2002). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed insofar as it set aside its 1993 and 1995 orders and determined that Tabor owed an arrearage. The cause is remand[131]*131ed for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

This court, on June 22, 2001, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 837 So.2d 335 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (table). The Supreme Court of Alabama has affirmed in part and reversed in part this court’s judgment and remanded the cause. Ex parte Tabor, 840 So.2d 115 (Ala.2002). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed insofar as it set aside its 1993 and 1995 orders and determined that Tabor owed an arrearage. The cause is remand[131]*131ed for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 So. 2d 130, 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 611, 2002 WL 1587130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tabor-v-buxton-alacivapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack