Taboola, Inc. v. Newsweek Media Group, Inc.

2019 NY Slip Op 2791
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 11, 2019
Docket8979 654462/18
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2791 (Taboola, Inc. v. Newsweek Media Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taboola, Inc. v. Newsweek Media Group, Inc., 2019 NY Slip Op 2791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Taboola, Inc. v Newsweek Media Group, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 02791)
Taboola, Inc. v Newsweek Media Group, Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 02791
Decided on April 11, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 11, 2019
Acosta, P.J., Manzanet-Daniels, Tom, Oing, JJ.

8979 654462/18

[*1]Taboola, Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Newsweek Media Group, Inc. formerly known as IBT Media, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.


Becker & Poliakoff LLP, New York (Glenn H. Spiegel of counsel), for appellants.

Sher Tremonte LLP, New York (Mark Cuccaro of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joel M. Cohen, J.), entered on or about September 28, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants' motion to vacate the judgment against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants failed to present any basis for vacating the judgment in light of their admitted default under the settlement agreement. Absent any factual basis in the record to relieve defendants from enforcement of the judgment, where a stipulation of settlement is unambiguous, "literal enforcement of its terms is not unjust" (Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v Rubenstein, 26 AD3d 219, 220 [1st Dept 2006]). Here, defendants have provided no facts to justify the invocation of the Court's inherent discretionary powers to relieve a party from judgment. Thus, strict enforcement of the second settlement agreement was warranted (see Mill Rock Plaza Assoc. v Lively, 224 AD2d 301, 301 [1st Dept 1996]).

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 11, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Rubenstein
26 A.D.3d 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Mill Rock Plaza Associates v. Lively
224 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taboola-inc-v-newsweek-media-group-inc-nyappdiv-2019.