Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
This text of Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00562-CV
Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure, Appellants
v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 08-793-FC3, HONORABLE DONALD HIGGINBOTHAM, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
In October 2009, the trial court found that appellants Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure were not indigent and signed orders removing their appointed attorneys from the case. In December we informed appellants that the reporter's record was overdue. In February, we informed them that their briefs were overdue and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if the briefs were not filed by March 8, 2010. To date, appellants have not filed a brief, paid their fees, arranged for the reporter's record to be filed, or communicated with this Court in any fashion. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: May 28, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tabetha-seiler-and-david-vidaure-v-texas-departmen-texapp-2010.