Taber v. White Real Estate Improvement Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Taber v. White Real Estate Improvement Corp.

258 A.D. 898, 16 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7488

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 898 (Taber v. White Real Estate Improvement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taber v. White Real Estate Improvement Corp., 258 A.D. 898, 16 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant White Real Estate Improvement Corporation moved for an order dismissing the complaint because it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue or, in the alternative, for an order requiring plaintiff separately to state and number her causes of action, and further in the alternative, for an order under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, striking out certain allegations of the complaint as irrelevant, redundant and unnecessary. The motion was denied and said defendant appeals. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant White Real Estate Improvement Corporation moved for an order dismissing the complaint because it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue or, in the alternative, for an order requiring plaintiff separately to state and number her causes of action, and further in the alternative, for an order under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, striking out certain allegations of the complaint as irrelevant, redundant and unnecessary. The motion was denied and said defendant appeals. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 898, 16 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taber-v-white-real-estate-improvement-corp-nyappdiv-1939.