Tabb v. California

375 U.S. 27, 84 S. Ct. 90, 11 L. Ed. 2d 44, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 536
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1963·No. 83 M·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tabb v. California, 375 U.S. 27, 84 S. Ct. 90, 11 L. Ed. 2d 44, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 536 (1963).

375 U.S. 27 (Tabb v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hunt
577 P.2d 717 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Chrisman
256 Cal. App. 2d 425 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Donnell v. Swenson
258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Missouri, 1966)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers
213 A.2d 613 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)