Tabatchnick v. Golden

Third Circuit

Tabatchnick v. Golden

71 F.2d 1017, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3362

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1934

DocketNo. 5231

StatusPublished

This text of 71 F.2d 1017 (Tabatchnick v. Golden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tabatchnick v. Golden, 71 F.2d 1017, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3362 (3d Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decree of the court below denying the petition of the bankrupts to be discharged. In making the order, no opinion was filed, but, after a thorough examination of the record by the individual members of this court, we are of opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.

Without discussing the matter in detail, we axe satisfied the credit statement given by the bankrupts evidenced their assets at that time and they have not satisfactorily accounted for the diminution of those assets. We are also satisfied that the improbable story of the disappearance of such books as the bankrupts kept is not worthy of belief.

All of the matters advanced by the bankrupts’ counsel have been duly considered, with the result that the decree below is approved and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decree of the court below denying the petition of the bankrupts to be discharged. In making the order, no opinion was filed, but, after a thorough examination of the record by the individual members of this court, we are of opinion that the appeal should be dismissed.

Without discussing the matter in detail, we axe satisfied the credit statement given by the bankrupts evidenced their assets at that time and they have not satisfactorily accounted for the diminution of those assets. We are also satisfied that the improbable story of the disappearance of such books as the bankrupts kept is not worthy of belief.

All of the matters advanced by the bankrupts’ counsel have been duly considered, with the result that the decree below is approved and affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 F.2d 1017, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tabatchnick-v-golden-ca3-1934.