Tabas, L. & R., Pet v. Main Line Health Inc

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 2018·No. 470 MAL 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

LESLEE SILVERMAN TABAS AND : No. 470 MAL 2017 RICHARD S. TABAS, :

:

Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :

v. :

: :

MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC., LANKENAU : HOSPITAL A/K/A LANKENAU MEDICAL : CENTER, JOHN J. LYNCH, III, DANIEL C. : LAZOWICK, D.O., JEROME SANTORO, : M.D., THOMAS P. SOLLECITO, D.M.D., : PHILLIP D. ROBINSON, FACHE W. : RANDALL RUSSELL, M.D., MAIN LINE : HEALTH HOME CARE AND HOSPICE, : MOUNTAIN LAUREL RISK RETENTION : GROUP, INC., :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tabas, L. & R., Pet v. Main Line Health Inc, (Pa. 2018).

Tabas, L. & R., Pet v. Main Line Health Inc (Tabas, L. & R., Pet v. Main Line Health Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.