Taback v. Department of Agriculture
This text of 120 F. App'x 373 (Taback v. Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JUDGMENT
This cause was considered on the record compiled before the Secretary of Agriculture and on the briefs of the parties. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be DENIED for the reasons stated in the judgment of the [374]*374court issued this date in No. 04-1128. As Mr. Taback makes clear, “the arguments of Post and Taback set forth in its Brief in support of its petition are also the arguments of Joel Taback in support of his petition.”
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 F. App'x 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taback-v-department-of-agriculture-cadc-2005.