Tabacchi v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tabacchi v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group

173 S.W.3d 662, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1512, 2005 WL 2649452

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 18, 2005

DocketED 85916

StatusPublished

This text of 173 S.W.3d 662 (Tabacchi v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tabacchi v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group, 173 S.W.3d 662, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1512, 2005 WL 2649452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Tabacchi (“Tabacchi”), appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis granting a Motion for Summary Judgment to American Family Mutual Insurance Group (“American Family”) on Tabacchi’s Petition against American Family claiming breach of contract and seeking declaratory relief.

Tabacchi raises two points on appeal. First, Tabacchi claims that there is ambiguity in American Family’s policy exclusion as applied to underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits. Further, she argues that because of this ambiguity, she should not be denied coverage for her husband’s death, which occurred while he was operating his motorcycle. Second, she argues that the trial court erred because its order was contrary to Tabacchi’s objectively reasonable expectation that American Family would provide full and consistent coverage for each vehicle. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*663 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Tabacchi (“Tabacchi”), appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis granting a Motion for Summary Judgment to American Family Mutual Insurance Group (“American Family”) on Tabacchi’s Petition against American Family claiming breach of contract and seeking declaratory relief.

Tabacchi raises two points on appeal. First, Tabacchi claims that there is ambiguity in American Family’s policy exclusion as applied to underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits. Further, she argues that because of this ambiguity, she should not be denied coverage for her husband’s death, which occurred while he was operating his motorcycle. Second, she argues that the trial court erred because its order was contrary to Tabacchi’s objectively reasonable expectation that American Family would provide full and consistent coverage for each vehicle. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*663 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 S.W.3d 662, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1512, 2005 WL 2649452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tabacchi-v-american-family-mutual-insurance-group-moctapp-2005.