Taal v. Krobatsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Taal v. Krobatsch

281 A.D.2d 621, 722 N.Y.S.2d 186, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3104

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D.2d 621 (Taal v. Krobatsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taal v. Krobatsch, 281 A.D.2d 621, 722 N.Y.S.2d 186, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover [622]*622damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered January 6, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, as the jury verdict in favor of the defendant could have been reached on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Altman, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover [622]*622damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered January 6, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, as the jury verdict in favor of the defendant could have been reached on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Altman, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 621, 722 N.Y.S.2d 186, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taal-v-krobatsch-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack