T.A. v. State

10 So. 3d 1201, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8857
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in T.A. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 So. 3d 1201
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 2009·No. No. 4D08-2971·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with grand theft and petit theft after a teacher at a day care center discovered that $593 was stolen from her purse located in a closet of [1202]*1202her classroom. We affirm the juvenile court’s finding that appellant committed grand theft. We reverse, however, the court’s denial of appellant’s motion for judgment of dismissal as to the charge of petit theft. The finding of guilt on this charge, which resulted from appellant’s rummaging through the closet of another teacher, was not supported by competent substantial evidence. We therefore remand this cause to the juvenile court with instructions to dismiss the petit theft charge.

Affirmed in pai't; Reversed in part.

TAYLOR, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

T.A. v. State, 10 So. 3d 1201, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8857 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

10 So. 3d 1201 (T.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.