T. & P. R. R. v. Lanham

Court of Appeals of Texas

T. & P. R. R. v. Lanham

1 White & W. 99

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 3, 1882

DocketNo. 2278, R. Book No. 4, p. 211

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 99 (T. & P. R. R. v. Lanham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T. & P. R. R. v. Lanham, 1 White & W. 99 (Tex. Ct. App. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 251. Charge of the court. It is error for the court to assume in the charge to the jury the main fact in controversy, and is especially noticeable and subject to revision where the defendant asked a special instruction, which was refused, calling the attention of the court to the real issue in the case.

§ 252. Measure of damages for stock killed. The value of the stock. killed or injured at the time of the killing is the measure of damages under art. 4245, Eev. Stats. [H. & T. C. R. R. Co. v. Muldrow, 54 Tex. 233.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 251. Charge of the court. It is error for the court to assume in the charge to the jury the main fact in controversy, and is especially noticeable and subject to revision where the defendant asked a special instruction, which was refused, calling the attention of the court to the real issue in the case.

§ 252. Measure of damages for stock killed. The value of the stock. killed or injured at the time of the killing is the measure of damages under art. 4245, Eev. Stats. [H. & T. C. R. R. Co. v. Muldrow, 54 Tex. 233.]

Eeversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-p-r-r-v-lanham-texapp-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack