T. New Manufacturing Co. v. Galway

New York Supreme Court

T. New Manufacturing Co. v. Galway

26 N.Y.S. 950, 23 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 239, 75 Hun 13

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 16, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 950 (T. New Manufacturing Co. v. Galway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T. New Manufacturing Co. v. Galway, 26 N.Y.S. 950, 23 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 239, 75 Hun 13 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

LAWRENCE, J.

As the two defendants appeared by the same attorney, but one allowance can be granted. It has been distinctly held that in an action brought by a judgment creditor to set aside a conveyance of land made by the defendant on the ground that it was made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors, in which action the plaintiff succeeds, an extra allowance must be based upon the amount due to the plaintiff upon his judgment, and not upon the value of the land. Potter v. Farrington, 24 Hun, 551. The same rule must apply where the defendant succeeds, as in this case, inasmuch as the suit only involves the value of the property to the extent of the alleged lien. The amount of the judgment in this case, the lien of which is sought to be established by this action, is the_sum of $464.18, and upon that amount an allowance at the yate of 5 per cent., to wit, the sum of $23.20, will be granted to the defendants. Findings signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAWRENCE, J.

As the two defendants appeared by the same attorney, but one allowance can be granted. It has been distinctly held that in an action brought by a judgment creditor to set aside a conveyance of land made by the defendant on the ground that it was made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors, in which action the plaintiff succeeds, an extra allowance must be based upon the amount due to the plaintiff upon his judgment, and not upon the value of the land. Potter v. Farrington, 24 Hun, 551. The same rule must apply where the defendant succeeds, as in this case, inasmuch as the suit only involves the value of the property to the extent of the alleged lien. The amount of the judgment in this case, the lien of which is sought to be established by this action, is the_sum of $464.18, and upon that amount an allowance at the yate of 5 per cent., to wit, the sum of $23.20, will be granted to the defendants. Findings signed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 950, 23 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 239, 75 Hun 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-new-manufacturing-co-v-galway-nysupct-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack