T. N. O. R. R. Co. v. Carr
This text of 43 S.W. 18 (T. N. O. R. R. Co. v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On April 20, 1896, H.A. Carr recovered judgment against the Texas New Orleans Railroad Company for $13,742.86, for personal injuries received April 24, 1894, which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. The petition, after stating the circumstances, alleged: "That by reason of the injuries aforesaid, plaintiff has been actually damaged in the sum of Ten Thousand One Hundred and Seventy Dollars ($10,170) and that, by reason of the crushing, mangling and bruising of plaintiff's leg as aforesaid, plaintiff has suffered great physical pain and mental anguish and agony, to his damage in the further sum of Five Thousand Dollars."
The trial court instructed the jury that if they should find for plaintiff they might assess his damages at a sum "not to exceed the amount sued for, to-wit: fifteen thousand one hundred and seventy dollars, with six per cent interest per annum from date of injury to the present time."
The action of the Court of Civil Appeals in overruling the assignment of error complaining of this charge is assigned as error here. We think the charge was on its face erroneous in that it permitted the jury to allow interest for the period of one year eleven months and twenty-six days intervening between the dates of the injury and judgment (Watkins v. Junker,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 S.W. 18, 91 Tex. 332, 1897 Tex. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-n-o-r-r-co-v-carr-tex-1897.