T. M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

T. M. v. State

415 So. 2d 904

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 29, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2647

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 415 So. 2d 904 (T. M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T. M. v. State, 415 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The finding of the trial court that T. M. was guilty of burglary and petty theft is reversed. There is no evidence in this record that the respondent participated in the burglary or ever had possession of the fruits thereof. G. C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J. L. B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); D. M. v. State, 394 So.2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); P. R. v. State, 389 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reversed and remanded with instruction to discharge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The finding of the trial court that T. M. was guilty of burglary and petty theft is reversed. There is no evidence in this record that the respondent participated in the burglary or ever had possession of the fruits thereof. G. C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J. L. B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); D. M. v. State, 394 So.2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); P. R. v. State, 389 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reversed and remanded with instruction to discharge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

415 So. 2d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-m-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack