T. M. v. State
415 So. 2d 904
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 1982·No. No. 81-2647·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The finding of the trial court that T. M. was guilty of burglary and petty theft is reversed. There is no evidence in this record that the respondent participated in the burglary or ever had possession of the fruits thereof. G. C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J. L. B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); D. M. v. State, 394 So.2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); P. R. v. State, 389 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Reversed and remanded with instruction to discharge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
T. M. v. State, 415 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
415 So. 2d 904 (T. M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
D.C. v. State
442 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
A.H. v. State
428 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)