T. M. James & Sons China Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

T. M. James & Sons China Co. v. United States

9 Cust. Ct. 674, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1387

United States Customs Court·Decided October 26, 1942·No. No. 5749; Entry No. 116-A, etc.·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

Upon reading and filing the notice of motion, dated the 9th day of September, 1942, the affidavit of Maxwell E. Anderson, sworn to on the 28th day of August, 1942, and the memorandum of Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General in charge of Customs, filed in support of said motion, dated the 9th day of September, 1942; and due deliberation having been had thereon.

It is hereby ordered that the appeals for reappraisement in Re-appraisement Nos. 145515-A, 145516-A, 145646-A, 147345-A, and 147346-A, be and the same hereby are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

Upon reading and filing the notice of motion, dated the 9th day of September, 1942, the affidavit of Maxwell E. Anderson, sworn to on the 28th day of August, 1942, and the memorandum of Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General in charge of Customs, filed in support of said motion, dated the 9th day of September, 1942; and due deliberation having been had thereon.

It is hereby ordered that the appeals for reappraisement in Re-appraisement Nos. 145515-A, 145516-A, 145646-A, 147345-A, and 147346-A, be and the same hereby are dismissed.

T. M. James & Sons China Co. v. United States, 9 Cust. Ct. 674, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1387 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

9 Cust. Ct. 674 (T. M. James & Sons China Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.