T. M. Cathey v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 185 F.2d 1021 (T. M. Cathey v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
185 F.2d 1021
T. M. CATHEY and C. C. Cathey doing business as Cathey
Lumber Company (Charles C. Cathey, as executor of
the estate of T. M. Cathey, substituted
for T. M. Cathey, deceased), Petitioners
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 13005.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 22, 1951.
Fred S. Ball, Jr., Montgomery, Ala., for petitioner.
-frederick U; Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before HOLMES, BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It is considered by the court that the petition to set aside the order of the Board should be, and the same hereby is, denied, and that the petition for enforcement of the Board's order should be, and the same hereby is, granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 F.2d 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-m-cathey-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca5-1951.