T. Lamar Caudle v. Rubey M. Hulen, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

231 F.2d 667, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3453
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 17, 1956
Docket15538
StatusPublished

This text of 231 F.2d 667 (T. Lamar Caudle v. Rubey M. Hulen, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
T. Lamar Caudle v. Rubey M. Hulen, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, 231 F.2d 667, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3453 (8th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition of petitioner for writ of mandamus denied, without prejudice to right of trial court, on its own motion or on motion of the parties, to reconsider the question of transfer at any time before trial should any such change of circumstances develop in the situation as to make it appear to the trial court to be desirable and in the interest of justice to order such transfer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 F.2d 667, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-lamar-caudle-v-rubey-m-hulen-united-states-district-judge-for-the-ca8-1956.