T. Joseph v. The Scranton Times
105 A.3d 655, 629 Pa. 311, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 3088
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 25, 2014·No. 407 MAL 2014 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
*312 ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:
a) Whether an appellate court may disregard the foundational rules requiring deference to the trial court’s factual findings and credibility determinations?
b) Whether a court may disregard the First Amendment constraints on defamation actions by concluding that the injury-in-fact liability element of a defamation claim is established without proof of reputational harm caused by defamatory statements?
c) Whether a court may disregard the First Amendment constraints on defamation actions by holding that proof of actual malice relieves plaintiffs of their burden to prove injury-in-fact?
d) Whether a court may disregard the First Amendment constraints that require a defamation plaintiff to prove falsity and fault on the part of a media defendant and order a retrial on damages only where the record does not establish that a plaintiff met his constitutional burdens?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
T. Joseph v. The Scranton Times, 105 A.3d 655, 629 Pa. 311, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 3088 (Pa. 2014).
105 A.3d 655 (T. Joseph v. The Scranton Times) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phelps, N. v. Caperoon, L.
190 A.3d 1230 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)
Bailets, R. v. Pa. Turnpike Commission, Aplt.
181 A.3d 324 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)
T. Joseph v. The Scranton Times, Aplt
129 A.3d 404 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)