T-Jais Pub, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

T-Jais Pub, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority

78 A.D.2d 640, 433 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13118

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 640 (T-Jais Pub, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T-Jais Pub, Inc. v. State Liquor Authority, 78 A.D.2d 640, 433 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Liquor Authority, made after a hearing, which found petitioner had altered its premises without permission of the authority and suspended its liquor license for a period of 10 days, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 15, 1979, which confirmed the determination and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The determination is supported by substantial evidence and the punishment was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Liquor Authority, made after a hearing, which found petitioner had altered its premises without permission of the authority and suspended its liquor license for a period of 10 days, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 15, 1979, which confirmed the determination and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The determination is supported by substantial evidence and the punishment was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 640, 433 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-jais-pub-inc-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1980.