T. F. Scholes Inc. of Ohio v. Bowers

Ohio Supreme Court

T. F. Scholes Inc. of Ohio v. Bowers

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 19, 1956

DocketNo. 34869

StatusPublished

This text of 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67 (T. F. Scholes Inc. of Ohio v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

T. F. Scholes Inc. of Ohio v. Bowers, 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67 (Ohio 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with instructions to clarify its decision as set forth in its entry of April 19, 1956, especially so as (1) to eliminate the apparent conflict between the second and fourth sentences of the last paragraph thereof, and (2) to state (a) whether, as to the five of the nine contracts in issue which do not contain on their faces a separation of labor and materials, materials and labor are separately stated on appellant’s books and (b), if so, whether the statement thereon with respect to materials is a statement as to the amount charged for such materials or only a statement as to the cost of such materials.

Cause remanded.

Wbygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, ZimmermaN, Stewart, Belt, and Taet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with instructions to clarify its decision as set forth in its entry of April 19, 1956, especially so as (1) to eliminate the apparent conflict between the second and fourth sentences of the last paragraph thereof, and (2) to state (a) whether, as to the five of the nine contracts in issue which do not contain on their faces a separation of labor and materials, materials and labor are separately stated on appellant’s books and (b), if so, whether the statement thereon with respect to materials is a statement as to the amount charged for such materials or only a statement as to the cost of such materials.

Cause remanded.

Wbygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, ZimmermaN, Stewart, Belt, and Taet, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-f-scholes-inc-of-ohio-v-bowers-ohio-1956.