T. A. Loving & Co. v. United States

132 F. Supp. 250, 132 Ct. Cl. 378, 1955 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 150
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJune 7, 1955
DocketNo. 6-53
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 F. Supp. 250 (T. A. Loving & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
T. A. Loving & Co. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 250, 132 Ct. Cl. 378, 1955 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 150 (cc 1955).

Opinion

Laramoke, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, contractors for the construction of the Veterans Administration Hospital, Beekley, West Virginia, were required by the contracting officer to install facing tile in the walls of the hospital’s boiler house and garage where the specifications called for “structural unglazed units.” It is plaintiffs’ position that this language permitted the use of cinder block. They claim the difference between the cost of installing facing tile and cinder block.

[379]*379The plaintiffs, coadventurers, were successful bidders on the Veterans’ Administration Hospital at Beckley, West Virginia. On February 19, 1948, a contract was executed for construction of the hospital. The contract price was $4,975,123.

The Finish Schedule on the key sheet which formed part of the plans and specifications indicated that wall finishes 50 and 51 should be “struc. unglazed units.” Section 5-04 of the specifications stated that “structural unglazed units marked in Finish Schedule * * * shall be smooth unglazed units.” Smooth unglazed units are described in detail in section 5-05, where, in subsection (b) (2), it is provided that all smooth unglazed units shall be manufactured of fireclay, shall be free from cracks with a smooth, unbroken, natural-die finish, and shall be buff in color.

Addendum No. 1 amended section 4 which related to brick and structural tile to permit the use of cinder block as an alternative to structural clay tile. Section 5, entitled “Masonry: Structural Facing Units,” was not so amended.

Plaintiffs employed the Southern Fireproofing Company as subcontractors to construct the interior walls in the hospital, in the boiler house and garage, and in the pump and meter house. The work was in progress when Samuel F. Brown, defendant’s liaison engineer on the Clarksburg and Beckley hospital projects, discovered that cinder blocks were being installed in the walls of a basement room in the “Beckley” hospital. The Finish Schedule indicated that the walls of this room were to be “struc. unglazed units.” The discovery was the first indication Mr. Brown had that plaintiffs were interpreting the phrase “structural unglazed units” in the Finish Schedule to permit the use of cinder blocks. To save the additional expense and loss of time which would ensue had the completed wall structure been removed, plaintiffs were permitted to cover the exposed cinder blocks with “soaps” of matte glazed tile, a non-load-bearing facing tile, which gave the same appearance as the structural unglazed units specified. Plaintiffs made the necessary adjustments without protest and without claim for additional costs.

Thereafter, under the instruction of defendant’s resident engineer, who had been cautioned by Mr. Brown to make sure [380]*380that the proper finish was used in the boiler house and garage where the Finish Schedule specified structural unglazed units, plaintiffs installed unglazed facing tile. They then claimed the sum of $19,284.29, representing the difference in the cost of installing facing tile over cinder block. The sum of $14,752.92 of this claim represented costs of the subcontractor. The claim was denied by the contracting officer and by the Army Board of Contract Appeals of the Corps of Engineers acting for the Secretary of the Army.

The question presented is whether the specifications here involved required the use of facing tile when “structural unglazed units” were called for on the Finish Schedule.

The pertinent provisions of the contract and specifications are as follows:

SPECIFICATIONS
SC-2 Drawings — contract drawings, maps cmd specifications. — Ten sets of contract drawings, maps and specifications will be furnished the contractor without charge. Additional sets will be furnished on request at the cost of reproduction. The work shall conform to the following drawings, all of which form a part of these specifications and are available in the Office of the Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, at Huntington, West Virginia.
Drawing No.: Title
40-04-ASHPE-l_Key Sheet.
32-01-A-2_Basement Floor Plan.
36-13-A-2_Plans.
SECTION 4
MASONRY: BRICK AND STRUCTURAL TILE
4-01. Scope: The work covered by this section of the specifications consists in furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, appliances, and materials, and in performing all operations in connection with the furnishing and installation of brick and structural tile masonry, complete, in strict accordance with this section of the specifications and the applicable drawings, and subject to the terms and conditions of the contract.
4r-02. Applicable Specifications: The following Federal Specifications form a part of this specification:
[381]*381HH-B-671e_Brick; Fire Olay.
QQ-B-71a_ Bars; Reinforcement, (For) Concrete.
SS-B-656_ Brick; Building (Common), Clay.
SS-B-681_ Brick; Sand-Lime.
SS_X_3K5__ Tile; Partition, Gypsum.
SS-T-341a_ Tile; Structural, Clay, Load-Bearing, Wall.
SS-T-351a_ Tile; Structural, Clay, Non-Load-Bearing.
4-03. Materials: * * *
(g) Structural Olay Tile: Structural clay tile shall include all the standard shapes required to complete the construction, and shall conform to the following:
(1) Load-Bearing Olay Tile: Load-bearing clay tile shall conform to the requirements of Federal Specifications SS-T-341a, grade LB, and shall be of design shown on drawings. The exposed faces of the tile shall be smooth except where the tile serves as a base for plaster in which case the tile shall have a plaster base finish..
(2) Non-Load-Bearing Olay Tile: Non-load-bearing clay tile shall conform to the requirements of Federal Specification SS-T-351a. The exposed faces of the tile shall be smooth except where the tile serves as a base for plaster in which case the tile shall be scored to receive the plaster. The tile shall have a clear ring when struck.
SECTION 5
MASONRY: structural PACING UNITS
5-01. Scope: The work covered by this section of the specifications consists in furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, appliances, and materials, and in performing all operations in connection with the furnishing and installation of the structural-facing-unit masonry, complete, in strict accordance with this section of the specifications and the applicable drawings, and subject to the terms and conditions of the contract.
5-02. Alternate O: Attention is invited to the fact that Alternate C provides for the elimination of painted walls above the structural glazed tile wainscot for Boom Finishes Nos.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard Goettle, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
600 F. Supp. 7 (N.D. Mississippi, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 F. Supp. 250, 132 Ct. Cl. 378, 1955 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/t-a-loving-co-v-united-states-cc-1955.