T-1, Inc. v. Hardie

Missouri Court of Appeals

T-1, Inc. v. Hardie

858 S.W.2d 310, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 3, 1993·No. Nos. 62971, 63291·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff entered into a contract with partnership. This contract required partnership to purchase plaintiff’s interest in a limited partnership. Defendants guaranteed the contract. When the partnership refused to purchase, plaintiff brought suit on defendants’ guarantee. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment, which was granted. Defendants appeal.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have [311] no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff entered into a contract with partnership. This contract required partnership to purchase plaintiff’s interest in a limited partnership. Defendants guaranteed the contract. When the partnership refused to purchase, plaintiff brought suit on defendants’ guarantee. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment, which was granted. Defendants appeal.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have [311] no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

T-1, Inc. v. Hardie, 858 S.W.2d 310, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

858 S.W.2d 310 (T-1, Inc. v. Hardie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related