Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Szymanski v. McCrory Corp., No. 27 07 45 (Aug. 28, 1990)

Szymanski v. McCrory Corp., No. 27 07 45 (Aug. 28, 1990)

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 1392
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 28, 1990
DocketNo. 27 07 45
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 1392 (Szymanski v. McCrory Corp., No. 27 07 45 (Aug. 28, 1990)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Szymanski v. McCrory Corp., No. 27 07 45 (Aug. 28, 1990), 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 1392 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS Because process was not returned six days before the return day, the Motion to Dismiss must be granted. La Mothe v. Gordon, 15 Conn. Sup. 504 (1948).

Perhaps the plaintiff may obtain relief under the provisions of 52-592 of the General Statutes.

GEORGE N. THIM, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilfred A. Lamothe v. Bessie Gordon
15 Conn. Super. Ct. 504 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 1392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szymanski-v-mccrory-corp-no-27-07-45-aug-28-1990-connsuperct-1990.