Szymanski v. Hults

14 A.D.2d 885, 220 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8132

This text of 14 A.D.2d 885 (Szymanski v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Szymanski v. Hults, 14 A.D.2d 885, 220 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Pette, J., concurs in the confirmation of the respondent’s determination, but dissents as to the punishment imposed upon the petitioner, with the following memorandum: In view of the 39-day suspension of license imposed upon another driver involved in a companion case arising out of the same accident (Matter of Wattecamps v. Hults, 13 A D 2d 1009), the revocation of petitioner’s license seems harsh and excessive. In my opinion, the punishment should be moderated to a suspension, of 39 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 885, 220 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szymanski-v-hults-nyappdiv-1961.