Szwerc, M. v. Lehigh Valley Health Network

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Szwerc, M. v. Lehigh Valley Health Network

DecidedFebruary 17, 2021

Docket443 MAL 2020 (Granted)

StatusPublished

This text of Szwerc, M. v. Lehigh Valley Health Network (Szwerc, M. v. Lehigh Valley Health Network) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Szwerc, M. v. Lehigh Valley Health Network, (Pa. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 10 - 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL F. SZWERC, M.D., : No. 443 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, : INC. D/B/A LEHIGH VALLEY NETWORK; : LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A : LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK AND : LEHIGH VALLEY HEART AND LUNG : SURGEONS; LEHIGH VALLEY PHYSICIAN : GROUP, AFFILIATED WITH THE LEHIGH : VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK D/B/A : LEHIGH VALLEY PHYSICIAN GROUP AND : LEHIGH VALLEY HEART AND LUNG : SURGEONS; SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS OF : LVHN, P.C. D/B/A LEHIGH VALLEY HEART : AND LUNG SURGEONS; MICHAEL D. : PASQUALE, M.D.; MICHAEL A. ROSSI, : M.D.; AND THOMAS V. WHALEN, M.D., : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the [t]rial [c]ourt’s [o]rder denying [Petitioner’s] Motion for Attorney[s’] Fees and Costs Incurred in Appeal and Collection of Judgment on the basis that such [m]otion was untimely and/or that the [t]rial [c]ourt lacked jurisdiction to consider same?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 10 - 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL F. SZWERC, M.D., : No. 443 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, : INC. D/B/A LEHIGH VALLEY NETWORK; : LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A : LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK AND : LEHIGH VALLEY HEART AND LUNG : SURGEONS; LEHIGH VALLEY PHYSICIAN : GROUP, AFFILIATED WITH THE LEHIGH : VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK D/B/A : LEHIGH VALLEY PHYSICIAN GROUP AND : LEHIGH VALLEY HEART AND LUNG : SURGEONS; SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS OF : LVHN, P.C. D/B/A LEHIGH VALLEY HEART : AND LUNG SURGEONS; MICHAEL D. : PASQUALE, M.D.; MICHAEL A. ROSSI, : M.D.; AND THOMAS V. WHALEN, M.D., : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the [t]rial [c]ourt’s [o]rder denying [Petitioner’s] Motion for Attorney[s’] Fees and Costs Incurred in Appeal and Collection of Judgment on the basis that such [m]otion was untimely and/or that the [t]rial [c]ourt lacked jurisdiction to consider same?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Szwerc, M. v. Lehigh Valley Health Network, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szwerc-m-v-lehigh-valley-health-network-pa-2021.