Szwalkiewicz v. Gorski Tool & Manufacturing Corp.

104 Wis. 2d 755
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1981·No. No. 79-1690·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. (dissenting). I would not dismiss the petition to review as having been improvidently granted. The court should decide the issues raised in this case.

Further, as I wrote in City of Racine v. Schwartz, 95 Wis. 2d 745, 298 N.W.2d 925 (1980), when the court grants the petition to review and the parties file briefs and argue the case, I believe that if the court at this late stage of the appellate proceeding dismisses the petition to review as having been improvidently granted, the court should set forth the reason for the dismissal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szwalkiewicz v. Gorski Tool & Manufacturing Corp., 104 Wis. 2d 755 (Wis. 1981).

104 Wis. 2d 755 (Szwalkiewicz v. Gorski Tool & Manufacturing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoskins v. United States Fire Insurance
509 N.W.2d 432 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1994)