Szwalkiewicz v. Gorski Tool & Manufacturing Corp.
This text of 104 Wis. 2d 755 (Szwalkiewicz v. Gorski Tool & Manufacturing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. (dissenting). I would not dismiss the petition to review as having been improvidently granted. The court should decide the issues raised in this case.
Further, as I wrote in City of Racine v. Schwartz, 95 Wis. 2d 745, 298 N.W.2d 925 (1980), when the court grants the petition to review and the parties file briefs and argue the case, I believe that if the court at this late stage of the appellate proceeding dismisses the petition to review as having been improvidently granted, the court should set forth the reason for the dismissal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 Wis. 2d 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szwalkiewicz-v-gorski-tool-manufacturing-corp-wis-1981.