Szurnicki v. Janisch

202 A.D.2d 1071, 612 N.Y.S.2d 983

This text of 202 A.D.2d 1071 (Szurnicki v. Janisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Szurnicki v. Janisch, 202 A.D.2d 1071, 612 N.Y.S.2d 983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Oshrin, J.). We add only that petitioners’ argument concerning the failure of respondent Kings Park Board of Education to comply with its own policy regarding notice was not raised at Supreme Court and is, therefore, not addressed on this appeal (see, Collucci v Collucci, 58 NY2d 834, 836-837). We further conclude that this proceeding is not barred by laches (see, Schreier v Cummings, 250 App Div 808). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Oshrin, J. — Article [1072]*107278.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and JJ. Boehm,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schreier v. Cummings
250 A.D. 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Collucci v. Collucci
446 N.E.2d 770 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 1071, 612 N.Y.S.2d 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szurnicki-v-janisch-nyappdiv-1994.