Szucs v. Recore

209 A.D.2d 803, 618 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11143
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1994·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered March 3, 1994 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent rescinding petitioner’s participation in the temporary release program.

Based on the evidence presented, which included information that petitioner had made repeated threats against his family, it was not irrational for respondent to rescind petitioner’s prior approval to participate in the temporary release program. Because temporary release is a discretionary program and a privilege, petitioner had no due process entitlement to continued participation in the program. Any remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szucs v. Recore, 209 A.D.2d 803, 618 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 803 (Szucs v. Recore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garson v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
21 Misc. 3d 373 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Nesbitt v. Goord
12 Misc. 3d 702 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Brown v. Rivera
299 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Bruno v. Recore
227 A.D.2d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Roucchio v. Coughlin
923 F. Supp. 360 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Kurtish v. Recore
220 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)