Szpak v. Szpak

168 A. 386, 114 N.J. Eq. 143, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 887
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Minturn in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

*Page 148

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szpak v. Szpak, 168 A. 386, 114 N.J. Eq. 143, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 887 (N.J. 1933).

168 A. 386 (Szpak v. Szpak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Smith
23 A.2d 903 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)