Szpak v. Szpak
168 A. 386, 114 N.J. Eq. 143, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 887
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Minturn in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.
*Page 148For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Szpak v. Szpak, 168 A. 386, 114 N.J. Eq. 143, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 887 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 386 (Szpak v. Szpak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Smith
23 A.2d 903 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)