Szimkus v. Ragauckas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Szimkus v. Ragauckas

189 Ill. App. 407

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedNovember 10, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,858

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 Ill. App. 407 (Szimkus v. Ragauckas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Szimkus v. Ragauckas, 189 Ill. App. 407 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

8. Libel and slander, § 64*—truth as a defense. Truth of the words published constitutes a sufficient defense only when the publication is with good motives and for justifiable ends. 9. Libel and slander, § 134*—evidence competent to prove meaning of words. In an action for libel, evidence to show that a person after reading the article withdrew money from the custody of plaintiff, explaining his conduct by stating how he interpreted the article, held competent to show the sense in which such person understood it. 10. Damages, § 175*—when evidence of pecuniary condition of parties admissible. In an action for libel, evidence is admissible to show the pecuniary circumstances of the defendants, if malice is shown'. 11. Libel and slander, § 155*—when verdict excessive. In an action for libel, a verdict in favor of plaintiff for twelve hundred dollars, held excessive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

8. Libel and slander, § 64*—truth as a defense. Truth of the words published constitutes a sufficient defense only when the publication is with good motives and for justifiable ends. 9. Libel and slander, § 134*—evidence competent to prove meaning of words. In an action for libel, evidence to show that a person after reading the article withdrew money from the custody of plaintiff, explaining his conduct by stating how he interpreted the article, held competent to show the sense in which such person understood it. 10. Damages, § 175*—when evidence of pecuniary condition of parties admissible. In an action for libel, evidence is admissible to show the pecuniary circumstances of the defendants, if malice is shown'. 11. Libel and slander, § 155*—when verdict excessive. In an action for libel, a verdict in favor of plaintiff for twelve hundred dollars, held excessive.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 Ill. App. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szimkus-v-ragauckas-illappct-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack