Szily v. Szily

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Szily v. Szily

13 A.2d 111, 140 Pa. Super. 65, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 412

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 10, 1940

DocketAppeals, 159 and 160

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.2d 111 (Szily v. Szily) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Szily v. Szily, 13 A.2d 111, 140 Pa. Super. 65, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 412 (Pa. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We have read the testimony in these cases with care and agree with the learned judge of the court below, who heard the cases, that the husband, who sought a divorce a vinculo matrimonii from his wife is not entitled to a decree; and that the wife, who sought a divorce a mensa et thoro from her husband, is entitled to a decree.

No good purpose will be served by reciting the unsavory details which appear in the record. They support the respective decrees entered by the court below.

No. 159—Decree affirmed at costs of appellant.

No. 160—Decree affirmed at costs of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We have read the testimony in these cases with care and agree with the learned judge of the court below, who heard the cases, that the husband, who sought a divorce a vinculo matrimonii from his wife is not entitled to a decree; and that the wife, who sought a divorce a mensa et thoro from her husband, is entitled to a decree.

No good purpose will be served by reciting the unsavory details which appear in the record. They support the respective decrees entered by the court below.

No. 159—Decree affirmed at costs of appellant.

No. 160—Decree affirmed at costs of appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.2d 111, 140 Pa. Super. 65, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szily-v-szily-pasuperct-1940.