Szewczyk v. State

16 So. 3d 270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11753, 2009 WL 2568290
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Szewczyk v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 963 So. 2d 239
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 2009·No. 2D08-4441·Published

Opinion

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Keri Szewczyk appeals her sentence of three years’ incarceration followed by eight years’ probation that was imposed upon the revocation of her probation. She correctly contends that the sentence was illegal because it exceeded the three-year suspended incarcerative component of the true split sentence that was originally imposed for an offense she committed on August 8, 2003. See Sullivan v. State, 625 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); see also Evans v. State, 730 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The State properly concedes that Szewczyk’s sentence was illegal. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

WALLACE and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szewczyk v. State, 16 So. 3d 270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11753, 2009 WL 2568290 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

16 So. 3d 270 (Szewczyk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. State
625 So. 2d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Evans v. State
730 So. 2d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)