Szerlip v. Finnegan

56 A.D.2d 626, 391 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10725
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, false arrest and false imprisonment, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 21, 1975, which granted the motion of defendant Town of Blooming Grove to dismiss the complaint as against it. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Neither a police officer nor his employer is subject to a claim of malicious prosecution, false arrest or false imprisonment for executing a certificate of commitment which appears valid on its face. Neither a town nor its employees may be held liable for carrying out an erroneous judicial mandate where the court had jurisdiction over the party and the subject matter involved (cf. Szerlip v Finnegan, 77 Misc 2d 655, affd 47 AD2d 603). Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szerlip v. Finnegan, 56 A.D.2d 626, 391 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

56 A.D.2d 626 (Szerlip v. Finnegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franza v. Town of Greenburgh
154 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)