Szentmiklosy v. County Neon Sign Corp.

276 A.D.2d 406, 715 N.Y.S.2d 11, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10777
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 24, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered November 8, 1999, which upon the grant of plaintiffs motion to renew, denied the previously granted motion of John Capelli Erectors for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Renewal was properly granted since the new evidence upon [407] which plaintiff relies, an affidavit by a witness to the accident for which recovery is sought, was not available at the time of the original motion, the affiant having then refused to provide an affidavit. Also proper was the denial of defendant Capelli Erectors’ previously granted summary judgment motion. The newly submitted affidavit raises triable issues as to whether the boom truck whose supporting leg allegedly encroached upon the sidewalk and thereby caused the affiant to trip and fall, striking plaintiff and precipitating his injury, was, in fact, the truck of Capelli Erectors. Nor did the motion to renew advance a different theory of liability. Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szentmiklosy v. County Neon Sign Corp., 276 A.D.2d 406, 715 N.Y.S.2d 11, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 406 (Szentmiklosy v. County Neon Sign Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S.V.L. v. PBM, LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 01133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)