Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

841 A.2d 217, 267 Conn. 666, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 32
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 Conn. 952
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 24, 2004·No. SC 16942·Published

Opinion

[667] Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Richard Szczapa, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the order of the Appellate Court granting the motion of the named defendant, United Parcel Service, Inc., to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the named defendant. We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal?” Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 Conn. 952, 817 A.2d 111 (2003).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 841 A.2d 217, 267 Conn. 666, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 32 (Colo. 2004).

841 A.2d 217 (Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
817 A.2d 111 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)