Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

841 A.2d 217, 267 Conn. 666, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 32

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedFebruary 24, 2004

DocketSC 16942

StatusPublished

This text of 841 A.2d 217 (Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 841 A.2d 217, 267 Conn. 666, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 32 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

[667]*667 Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Richard Szczapa, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the order of the Appellate Court granting the motion of the named defendant, United Parcel Service, Inc., to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the named defendant. We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal?” Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 Conn. 952, 817 A.2d 111 (2003).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[667]*667 Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Richard Szczapa, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the order of the Appellate Court granting the motion of the named defendant, United Parcel Service, Inc., to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the named defendant. We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal?” Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 Conn. 952, 817 A.2d 111 (2003).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

841 A.2d 217, 267 Conn. 666, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szczapa-v-united-parcel-service-inc-conn-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack