Szathmary v. Adams
This text of 44 N.E. 124 (Szathmary v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is a familiar rule of law, that, in the absence of an express agreement to the contrary, the owner of a tenement let to a tenant is not bound to make repairs upon it during the term, and that the tenant alone is liable to third persons for damages caused by suffering the premises to become dangerous for want of proper repairs. Kirby v. Boylston Market Association, 14 Gray, 249. Milford v. Holbrook, 9 Allen, 17, 21. Clifford v. Atlantic Cotton Mills, 146 Mass. 47.
The plaintiff was injured by the fall of a window blind from a part of 'the defendant’s building which had been let to a tenant. The judge found as a fact that at the time of the accident the blind was in the exclusive use and control of the tenant. There is nothing in the bill of exceptions to indicate that this finding was erroneous, nor to control the presumption of law that it was the duty of the tenant to keep the premises safe for persons passing or standing on-the sidewalk below.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 N.E. 124, 166 Mass. 145, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szathmary-v-adams-mass-1896.