Szabo v. Cerra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Szabo v. Cerra

238 A.D.2d 344, 656 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3434

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 344 (Szabo v. Cerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Szabo v. Cerra, 238 A.D.2d 344, 656 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated September 17, 1996, which, inter alia, granted custody of the parties’ minor child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is a sound and substantial basis in' the record for the Family Court’s decision awarding custody to the father (see, Matter of Castillo v Hernandez, 220 AD2d 746; Matter of Williamson v Williamson, 215 AD2d 767; Matter of Canazon v Canazon, 215 AD2d 652), and therefore the determination will not be disturbed on appeal.

The mother’s remaining contention is without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated September 17, 1996, which, inter alia, granted custody of the parties’ minor child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is a sound and substantial basis in' the record for the Family Court’s decision awarding custody to the father (see, Matter of Castillo v Hernandez, 220 AD2d 746; Matter of Williamson v Williamson, 215 AD2d 767; Matter of Canazon v Canazon, 215 AD2d 652), and therefore the determination will not be disturbed on appeal.

The mother’s remaining contention is without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 344, 656 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/szabo-v-cerra-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack