Syvertson v. Malaktaris

North Dakota Supreme Court

Syvertson v. Malaktaris

2000 ND 211, 622 N.W.2d 432, 2000 WL 33128181

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 11, 2000

Docket20000146

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 2000 ND 211 (Syvertson v. Malaktaris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Syvertson v. Malaktaris, 2000 ND 211, 622 N.W.2d 432, 2000 WL 33128181 (N.D. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1 Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Charles E. Syvertson appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint under Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P. This Court reviews an appeal from a Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., dismissal in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, taking as true the allegations in the complaint. Burke v. North Dakota Dep't of Corrections andRehabilitation, 2000 ND 85, ¶ 4, 609 N.W.2d 729. Under Rule 35.1(a)(6), N.D.R.App.P., we summarily affirm the trial court's judgment.

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J.

MARY MUEHLEN MARING

WILLIAM A. NEUMANN

CAROL RONNING KAPSNER

DAVID W. NELSON, D.J.

[¶ 3] The Honorable DAVID W. NELSON, D.J., sitting in place of SANDSTROM, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI