System Design Associates v. Attorney General's Office

West Virginia Court of Claims

System Design Associates v. Attorney General's Office

21 Ct. Cl. 79

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 26, 1996

DocketCC-96-9

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 79 (System Design Associates v. Attorney General's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

System Design Associates v. Attorney General's Office, 21 Ct. Cl. 79 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer. •

The claimant seeks payment of $924.00 for computer hardware provided to the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted invoices for the computer hardware with its Notice of Claim which total $1,350.00. The record indicates that the computer hardware did not work as expected and the price was reduced. The invoices for the computer hardware were not processed for payment in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which to pay this claim.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $924.00.

Award of $924.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM;

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Answer. •

The claimant seeks payment of $924.00 for computer hardware provided to the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted invoices for the computer hardware with its Notice of Claim which total $1,350.00. The record indicates that the computer hardware did not work as expected and the price was reduced. The invoices for the computer hardware were not processed for payment in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which to pay this claim.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $924.00.

Award of $924.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/system-design-associates-v-attorney-generals-office-wvctcl-1996.