Syrek v. Allstate Insurance
This text of 310 So. 2d 355 (Syrek v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellants seek review of (1) a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict wherein minor plaintiff, Vincent Syrek, was awarded zero dollars and plaintiff, Leon Syrek, Vincent’s father, was awarded the sum of $62, and (2) an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for new trial.
After a careful review of the record on appeal, briefs and oral argument of counsel, we conclude that appellants have failed to demonstrate that reversible error was committed in the proceedings below. See Ellingson v. Willis, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 311; Tate v. Gray, Fla.App.1974, 292 So.2d 618 and Shaw v. Puleo, Fla.1964, 159 So.2d 641.
We also considered defendant-appellees’ cross-appeal from the order denying defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment with respect to the derivative claim of Leon Syrek and find it to be lacking in merit.
Accordingly, the final judgment and orders herein appealed are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 So. 2d 355, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/syrek-v-allstate-insurance-fladistctapp-1975.