Syracuse Solar Salt Co. v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad
61 N.E. 1135, 168 N.Y. 650, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 968
Opinion
J udgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J"., Gray, Bartlett, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Taking no part: Martin, J. Not sitting: Vann, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Syracuse Solar Salt Co. v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad, 61 N.E. 1135, 168 N.Y. 650, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 968 (N.Y. 1901).
61 N.E. 1135 (Syracuse Solar Salt Co. v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stewart v. . Turney
142 N.E. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)