Syracuse Solar Salt Co. v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad
61 N.E. 1135, 168 N.Y. 650, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 968
This text of 61 N.E. 1135 (Syracuse Solar Salt Co. v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Syracuse Solar Salt Co. v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad, 61 N.E. 1135, 168 N.Y. 650, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 968 (N.Y. 1901).
Opinion
J udgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J"., Gray, Bartlett, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Taking no part: Martin, J. Not sitting: Vann, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stewart v. . Turney
142 N.E. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
61 N.E. 1135, 168 N.Y. 650, 1901 N.Y. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/syracuse-solar-salt-co-v-rome-watertown-ogdensburg-railroad-ny-1901.