Synor v. Padavano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Synor v. Padavano

15 A.D.3d 1010, 788 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1008

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 1010 (Synor v. Padavano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Synor v. Padavano, 15 A.D.3d 1010, 788 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered January 22, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendants Darren M. Padavano and D.M. Padavano Construction Co. to dismiss the cause of action for negligence against them based upon the statute of limitations.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of the motion of defendants Darren M. Padavano and D.M. Padavano Construction Co. seeking dismissal of the cause of ac[1011]*1011tion for negligence against them on the ground that it accrued more than three years prior to commencement of the action (see CPLR 214 [4]; Johnson v Marianetti, 202 AD2d 970 [1994]; City of Niagara Falls v Rudolph, 97 AD2d 971 [1983]; see also Manhattanville Coll. v James John Romeo Consulting Engr., 5 AD3d 637, 641 [2004]; Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v Hunter Turbo Corp., 241 AD2d 505, 506 [1997]). Present — Pigott, Jr., EJ., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered January 22, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendants Darren M. Padavano and D.M. Padavano Construction Co. to dismiss the cause of action for negligence against them based upon the statute of limitations.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of the motion of defendants Darren M. Padavano and D.M. Padavano Construction Co. seeking dismissal of the cause of ac[1011]*1011tion for negligence against them on the ground that it accrued more than three years prior to commencement of the action (see CPLR 214 [4]; Johnson v Marianetti, 202 AD2d 970 [1994]; City of Niagara Falls v Rudolph, 97 AD2d 971 [1983]; see also Manhattanville Coll. v James John Romeo Consulting Engr., 5 AD3d 637, 641 [2004]; Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v Hunter Turbo Corp., 241 AD2d 505, 506 [1997]). Present — Pigott, Jr., EJ., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 1010, 788 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/synor-v-padavano-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack