Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia
DecidedJanuary 11, 2022
Docket3:21-cv-00252
StatusUnknown

This text of Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc. (Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc., (E.D. Va. 2022).

Opinion

INT HEUN ITESDT ATDEISS TRCIOCUTR T FORT HEE ASTEDRINS TROIFVC ITR GINIA RichmDoinvdi sion SYNOPSYISN,C ., Plaintiff, CivAicltN ioo3.n:l 2c v252 V. RISBKA SESDE CURIITNYC,. , Defendant. OPINION Thceo mpaintnih leiisst igatioInn-(cS".yS nyonpoaspnRysdisy Bs,sak "s )Se edc urity, In(c".R BS")-ainsddhe anwrtieitt fyhh ce uisrt osmoeftrwssae rceuv ruiltnye raEbairlliiteire thyiesaa rft,Se yrn oapnsnyosu andcdeidwt oiroipkntl a aln tnopee dr foirtnmh a irseR aB,sS e nt Synopacs eyasas nedd e sliestattl elret ghiSanytgn oppslyasn'wnsoe rwdko uclodn stitut copyirnifrgihntgo efRm BeSdn'atst ambiassaep,p roofRp BrSit'arstas ideoecn ra enttdos r,t ious interwfieRtrBheS nc'cuser arnepdnr to speeccotnirovemeli act iSoynnsohtpihspbeysrns.o ught thaicst isoene,ka id negc lajruadtgomtrehySna yttn opcsoynsd'dusoc entso s to i nfringe, misapproorip nrtieSarytfenero,eap .ls ssyuosRe BsfoS r c opymriisguhste . Itnh meo ntlhesa duipt naoNg o vem1b82e,0r 2h 1e arbienfotgrh eCi osu RrBtSm, o ved tdoi smSiysnso pcslyafosir'cm so pymriisgauhnstmde o vfoerdj udgomnet nhptel eaadsti on gs Synopostyhsce'lrsa iAmtts h.he e artihnCeog u,gr rta ntthmeeod t itoodn i smbiescsa use copymriisgcuhostne s tainat ffiurtmeadste ifevnbesun eto,a t na ffirmactliavAienm db.,e caau se justiccoinatbreloxevi easrntsRdeyB dhS a wda iivtaesbd i tleoin tfoyar fo creu m-seclleacutsieo,n thCeo udretn RiBeSdm' ost foiroj nu dgomnet nhptel eadTihnCego suf.ru tr etxhpelrta hiensse holdbienlgosw . SintcheNe o vem1b8he era rRiBnShg a,fis l ewdi tthhC eo uarc to vennoatns tu teo ("coveannaadl n ettt"toS)e y rn owpistyhsd riatcwsei aansngded e sliest(tt" ewri thldertatwearl" ) Thpea rdtiisepsu tet hwedhsoeect uhmreeernn ttdhsece ra o srce o ntrmoovoaetnrt dsh,yur se,q uire dismoifsS syanlo prseymsa'icsnl ianiRgmB sSs: a tyhsde oyS; y nopssatyyhssde oy nTohte.

Couhretla hd e arointn hgpe a rtairegsu'mo enJn atnsu 6a,2r 0y2 2B.e caRuBsShe a nso t demonstthrtaahtcte oe vde rneamnetod rpi reesv tehinent jsu Sryineosap lslyestg hCeeos uw,ri tl l nodti smtihasecs t aismo ono t. I.FACTASL LEGIENTD H EC OMPLAINT A.Tl,Lee tatnetdrl, L ea wsuit OnM ar3c0h2, 0 2S1y,n oipsssyausp e rder sesl aenansoeu intdcsei snigg ansaaC tNiA1o.n Itnh ree leSaysneo,ap lspsyroso mti"osc eldao g saebp e"t wtehveeun l nercaubrirlleiintstitleeysd int hCeV Ed ataabnaadsw ei drearno gfue n idevnutlinfieerda (bEiCNlFoi 4.t9 ia,e2t s. I.)n respoonnA sper5,i2, l0 2R1B,Ss eSnytn oapc seyasas nedd e sliestatts esre trhtSaiytnn go psys

couclodm piltenste eww oraksa C NAo nliyfi at cquainrddei ds cltorsasededec rtehtast Synopssyusb'ssi diarDyu-cBkSl oaftcwkaI rnec,(. " BlaDcukc k")-ahlalde gedly misapprfroopmRr BiSap'trsei dvv ualtnee rdaabtiaVlbuialtsnye(D ,EB C.NF o1 .- 1I.tn)h l ee tter, RBSs tattheSadyt n op's'ytsh'rsre ealteoeafVns ueeld n cDoBn taenindnt fo rmwaotuiilofdn, consummcaotnesdt,.i .ta.u) tc eo pyriingfrhitn geomfte hnetV ulnDdBa tabase; b)misapproof[p trrisaaedtceiru oenntd tsehD]ree fenTdr ade ASc.et.c a.rn esdtt sla atuwen der thVei rginia TArca.td. ;e.a nScde) tc orretitinsot uesr fweirtRehBn Sc'cesu rraenndt

1T hCeo mmoVnu lneraabnEidxl piot(si"ueCrsVe PE r"o)g irdaemn tdiefifienasen,sd , catapluobgldsii cslcycl yobseerds veuclunreirtaAydb eisliitgCinVeaENst u.em db eAruitnhgo rity ("CA'N'm)a ya ssCiVgEni dentinfiucmabtteiorno sen w dliys covvuelrneedr a"bfoirl iti incliunfis risotnp- utbialmnienc o uncoefnm eevwnu tlsn era(bEiClNFio 1t.a,i 9t e;E s C.FN" o . prospeecctoinvoerm eilca tiuonndsVehirir pgsic noimam olna w.("I ad.t2 . )R BSfu rther demantdheadSt y nopsstyousps indgi,s triobrum toidnigfy,vi unlgn eraibdielnittiiinfie esd VulnDanBd alvlu lneraSbyinloiptmsiiyegssh dti scovvieaBr l acDku cka'lsl eged misapproopfrV iualtnDiaBon,ndr equetshtaSetyd n opasgyrsei enw, r ittionr ge,fr afrionm

identviufylinnegr atboCi VlEui nttciioelms p loefts ieopnaM raastsea chsutsacetoteult ristt igatio betwRBeSe na nBdl aDcukc k(.I dT.h)le e tctoenrc luded: Nos tatecmoennttai intn helides t stheabrle cl o nstarswu aeidv oirno gt herwise prejudRiBcSi'rnsig gt host e eakna pproprreimaeitdntey h eev etnhtmi ast itse r noetx pedirteisooulsvleyd . (IdS.y)n oppsryosm pfitlletydh siusis te,e kaid negc larjautdogrmtyeh nSatyt n opscyosn'dsu ct doensos toi nfrimnigsea,p proorip nrtiearatfeneard,le l,e cgoipnygrm iigshuts e. B.ThMea ssuasceA/tc,tt si o11 Thoutghhai cst sitoenfrm osmS ynopsMyasr'2cs0h 2 d1e signaasatC iNoAan n RdB S's subseqcueeaansntedd e sistR BlSae ntSdty enro,p sys-Styhnroopusgsyhus b'ssi Bdliaarcyk, Duck-haal voenh gi st2 oIrn2y 0.1R4B,Sa nBdl aDcukc ekn teirneatdl o i cenasgirnege ment ("tAhger eemetona tl"l)Bo lwa Dcukc tko i ncorpRoBrSa'ptsre i vate vdualtnaebraasbei,l VulnDiBn,it toos w np roduBcltaD.cu kc tkh esnu blictehpners oeddtu oic tctsu stom(eErCsF. No1.4 2a,t7n .4I.n2) 0 1R8B,Ss ueBdl aDcukc iknM assachsutsaettefot rscs oeuvrectrl aali ms (See relattote hAdeg reemiennctl,um diisnagp proopftr riasadeteci roent EsC.FN o1.4 3-T8h.e) Massachusetrtesm aoliningtsoi aignnaodtgn i,D o enc em1b4e2,r0 2R1B,Sa ddSeydn opassay s parttoty h aactt i(oEnCN.Fo 1.4 9-3.)

2 C. TJ,Ceo venaantndl,t We i thdrLaewtatle r OnN ovem2b92e,0r 2R 1B,fiS l weidtt hhCe o utrhcteo veannawdni tt hdlreat(wtEaeClrF . Nos1.31 23,2 -1,T h1ce3o 2v-ep2nr.ao)nv tii pnda erst,: NOWT,H EREFiOnrR eEl,i oanSn ycneo pCsNyANs o'n -RUesper esentation RBhSe rceobvye nnoattnso tu Ssey nofoprsa ynasyn adle lx isotfriu ntcgul raei ms basoenSd y noprsoyalssaeC' NsAr eltaVotu eldn DB. (ECNFo1 .3 2a-3t1. ,I) nt hwei thdratwoSa yln olpResBtyS"ts we,ir t htdhArepa rw5is2,l 0 21 cease-alnedt-stdueebrss,ie"csq otur ernets paonn"dda ensnyuc bes,ea qsuseencrtot nicoenrn ing Synopussoyerps o't eunsotefVi ualln iDinBt r soa laseC NA.("E CNFo1 .3 2a-2t2. ,) IID.ISCUSSION Att htei moeft hNeo vem1b8he era rRiBnShg a,nd o yte its stuhecedo venant a withdlreatwTtahelCer o .u firrtas dtd rtehsfaesc etassst heexyi dsutretidhn Nego vem1b8e r hearaintndhg se,en p araanatlejyluzyse tsi iclnii aogbfthi htlce io tvyea nnawdni tt hdlreatwtaelr .

3 RBSd efinSeysn ops"yCsN'ANs o n-URseep resenats"a Styinoonpss"y s' represoefnn otna-touifVso uenl sn DB,o raB nOoySt Ahv,eu rl nedraatbaiiblinait rtssoyea l sae CNAa,ss efotr tiihnt s optpRooB sSmi'otsti foioronr n e consoifRd BeSrp'arstim iooortnt i oo n st(a[yE NCoF.7 ]4a )n idtc so unrseeplr'ess deunrttiahntNegio ovnesm1 b82e,0r 2h 1e aring. (ECNFo1 .3 2a-3t1. ,) A, November 18, 2021 Hearing’ /. Case or Controversy RBS argues that the Court should dismiss Synopsys’s declaratory judgment claims because “Synopsys mooted any controversy by disclaiming reliance on VulnDB ... in its role as a CNA.” (ECF No. 89, at 3.) RBS also raises several alternative arguments for dismissing these claims for lack of substantial controversy, including that Synopsys has not identified “the ‘potential future’ disclosures that it will make as a CNA” and that RBS has not registered its asserted copyrights. (id. at 4, 7; ECF No. 71, at 8, 11-13.) None of RBS’s arguments warrant dismissal. Under the Declaratory Judgment Act, a federal court “may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought” where “a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction” exists. 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a). “[T]he phrase ‘case of actual controversy’ □□□ refers to the type of ‘Cases’ and ‘Controversies’ that are justiciable under Article III.” Med/mmune Inc., v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 127 (2007) (citing Aetna Life Ins. Co. v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aetna Life Insurance v. Haworth
300 U.S. 227 (Supreme Court, 1937)
MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
549 U.S. 118 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Consumeraffairs. Com, Inc.
591 F.3d 250 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
Seneca Insurance v. Shipping Boxes I, LLC
30 F. Supp. 3d 506 (E.D. Virginia, 2014)
Republican Party of North Carolina v. Martin
980 F.2d 943 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/synopsys-inc-v-risk-based-security-inc-vaed-2022.