Synnott v. Shaw

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Synnott v. Shaw

74 A. 526, 77 N.J.L. 803, 48 Vroom 803, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 232

DecidedNovember 17, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A. 526 (Synnott v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Synnott v. Shaw, 74 A. 526, 77 N.J.L. 803, 48 Vroom 803, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 232 (N.J. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reason given for the affirmance of the judgment in the case of Synnott v. Froelich, in which the following memorandum was filed: “Per Curiam. The judgment brought up by this writ of error is sought to be reversed upon sundry assignments of trial errors.”

The case furnished the court discloses no exceptions sealed by the trial judge. There being nothing for us to review, the judgment must be affirmed. McLaughlin v. Davis, 35 Vroom 360.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garei-soN, Swayze, Reed, TRENCHaed, PaRker, BERGEN, Voor-iiees, MiNturN, Bogert, VeedeNburgh, Vroojí, Gray, Dill, J.J. 15.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reason given for the affirmance of the judgment in the case of Synnott v. Froelich, in which the following memorandum was filed: “Per Curiam. The judgment brought up by this writ of error is sought to be reversed upon sundry assignments of trial errors.”

The case furnished the court discloses no exceptions sealed by the trial judge. There being nothing for us to review, the judgment must be affirmed. McLaughlin v. Davis, 35 Vroom 360.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garei-soN, Swayze, Reed, TRENCHaed, PaRker, BERGEN, Voor-iiees, MiNturN, Bogert, VeedeNburgh, Vroojí, Gray, Dill, J.J. 15.

For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A. 526, 77 N.J.L. 803, 48 Vroom 803, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/synnott-v-shaw-nj-1909.