Syncom Corp. v. BK. LEUMI TRUST CO. OF NY
This text of 479 So. 2d 207 (Syncom Corp. v. BK. LEUMI TRUST CO. OF NY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SYNCOM CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
BANK LEUMI TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Margulies & Rones and Victor K. Rones, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Britton, Cassel, Schantz & Schatzman and Arthur M. Simon, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
*208 PER CURIAM.
Syncom Corporation [Syncom] challenges an adverse final judgment. First, Syncom contends that appellee's claim, based on non-payment of promissory notes and guarantees, is unenforceable because required documentary stamps were not affixed to the notes; second, that it is entitled to set off judgments appellee obtained against other parties; and third, that the amount awarded for attorneys' fees award was improper. We affirm.
By failing to plead the absence of documentary stamps as an affirmative defense, appellant waived the issue. Goldberger v. Regency Highland Condominium Association, Inc., 452 So.2d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Fink v. Powsner, 108 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958), cert. discharged, 114 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1959). The other points lack merit. We therefore affirm the final judgment without prejudice to appellant applying to the trial court for correction of any clerical error in the final judgment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 So. 2d 207, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2618, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/syncom-corp-v-bk-leumi-trust-co-of-ny-fladistctapp-1985.