Symons v. Prodinger

768 N.W.2d 317, 484 Mich. 851
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 28, 2009
Docket137768
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 768 N.W.2d 317 (Symons v. Prodinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Symons v. Prodinger, 768 N.W.2d 317, 484 Mich. 851 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

768 N.W.2d 317 (2009)

Kelly Sue SYMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel A. Symons, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dr. Robert J. PRODINGER, Dale Russell, P.A., and Battle Creek Emergency Room Physicians, P.C., Defendants-Appellees, and
Battle Creek Health Systems, Defendant.

Docket No. 137768. COA No. 269663.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 28, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REINSTATE the Calhoun Circuit Court's order denying defendant Dr. Robert Prodinger's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court instructed the jury that its decision as to defendant Dale *318 Russell's negligence would also determine Dr. Prodinger's responsibility. Because Dr. Prodinger failed to object to that jury instruction, he cannot now disclaim vicarious liability for Russell's negligence. Although the plaintiff did not plead a cause of action based on vicarious liability against Dr. Prodinger in the complaint, the Court of Appeals dissent correctly noted that under MCR 2.118(C)(1), issues that are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, even though they are not raised in the pleadings, are treated as if they had been raised by the pleadings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jessica Ohst v. Matthew J Crehan
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2021
Botsford Continuing Care Corp. v. Intelistaf Healthcare, Inc.
807 N.W.2d 354 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2011)
Smith v. ANSARA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
768 N.W.2d 317 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 N.W.2d 317, 484 Mich. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/symons-v-prodinger-mich-2009.