Symons v. Eichelberger

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 308
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Symons v. Eichelberger. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Ohio St. 224
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 29, 1924·No. No. 18091·Published

Opinion

ALLEN, J.

1. The courts of the State of Ohio will give full faith and credit to the judicial decrees of courts of reeord of the District of Columbia. Such decrees are conclusive upon the merits of the eontroversv therein adjudicated.

2. Suit may be maintained upon a judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered by the Su~ courts of record of the District of Columbia, against a co-respondent in a divorce suit for the costs of such suit, without alleging or proving that plaintiff has paid such costs.

3. In an action upon a judgment rendered in a court of record of the District of Columbia, jurisdiction is presumed. The burden of proof of establishing that the court in question had no jurisdiction to render the judgment sued upon rests upon the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Symons v. Eichelberger, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 308 (Ohio 1924).

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 308 (Symons v. Eichelberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.